Elizabeth,
Thank you for mentioning me and providing a site link in the Sunday business section.
I have two items that I would like to address. One is the credit side issue where you feel a short sale and foreclosure are congruently bad, the other is Short Sale vs. Foreclosure.
Credit and score:
As quoted in your article, a short sale and a foreclosure equally adversely affect your credit. By definition in the eyes of a credit agency’s score rating and a lender without any mentioned context you are absolutely correct. Score rating is short term phenomena and credit profile is a journey. However, as soon as the view point shifts into the context of the homeowner requesting a new loan (the journey) with a benefit of a plan you are absolutely incorrect. Our solution provides a “Day 1” credit strategy and “Life After the Short Sale”, how to mend your credit and navigate your way back to a new mortgage in as little as 12-24 months plan.
Short Sale vs. Foreclosure:
You obviously were not swayed in any way by our conversation last Thursday so I am not going to spar with you in an attempt to change your mind. However, I would like to give you a real life example of another successful transaction that I just got approved. I am going to outline the proposal and then explain the alternative the homeowner/borrower faced without the benefit of the short sale. Please keep in mind that the financial incentive was gone and the homeowner wanted out. Regardless of your view that the lenders should modify terms and everything will be fine, most people are looking for a way out. Please also understand that we provide a definitive solution for the lenders involved that exposes the incentives for them to avoid foreclosure and do not simply ask them what they will do for our clients.
1) Successful Short Sale proposal: Ironically Last Thursday afternoon after our call I completed another short sale proposal with a major lender. The borrower was gainfully employed with Fannie Mae but did not have the approx. $100,000 after home selling expenses to pay the lender. This was another homeowner that was not financially destitute but has a real affordability problem with the home .The property was sold for $305,000 and lender agreed to accept our proposal with no further recourse on the forgiven $100,000 in mortgage debt. Our program helped obtain a contract in this market within the first 30 days. Our proposal allowed the homeowner to get out from under the financial burden of the home and also walk away from a significant sum of unpaid mortgage debt. Foreclosure was averted and the majority of the borrower’s credit was saved with the implementation of our credit plan. The forward liability has been quantified and in this real life example it is zero. This is now merely a speed bump in this individual’s journey and future financial history.
2) Foreclosure: Alternatively, let’s assume this borrower advocated your position from our Thursday phone call and simply let the home go into foreclosure. The lender would have eventually taken the property back through the legal means of foreclosure mandated by separate state law. Within 30-60 days the lender would then submit to the state court a deficiency amount within the state allowances. The court would approve the deficiency and the homeowner/borrower would have a judgment for this amount on their credit for up to 20 years. This judgment would earn the legal limit, usually 9.0%, until satisfied. The approximate $100,000, or specifically what the state allows and the court approves, will be subject to collection activities by the lender. The lender would have the right to go after this money by all legal means available to them under the law. The liability is clearly present and the emotional pain of collection agents, wage garnishments, and administrators will soon begin. Keep in mind the lenders did in fact lend the people the money and they have a right to legal remedy. Given the after tax income required to settle such a large sum many borrowers seek the refuge of bankruptcy. Please ask any attorney if you question my statements.
In summary, it’s all about personal choice. A distressed homeowner currently has two choices to address your mortgage problem:
• One - they can pay all the expenses of selling their home and make up the difference you
owed to the lenders.
• Two - they can choose to do nothing and allow the property to go to foreclosure.
I am giving them a third choice. They can choose to take the positive proactive path and propose a comprehensive solution to the lenders in the form of a short sale proposal. With our solution they will save the majority of their credit and minimize the negative financial impact of the mortgage problem. The choice between the current two options and our suggested third alternative is completely up to the homeowner.
Now you can decide if a short sale or a foreclosure is the path to take. The short sale quantifies the personal liability and represents cooperation and a comprehensive solution that addresses all four major items in my “dear homeowner” letter on my site. A foreclosure is the result of a homeowner that is simply dumping their problem on the lender. Foreclosures carry liability unless deficiency judgments are preempted by state law as they are in only a few states. Such liability can drive many to bankruptcy. As far as the credit strategy goes well you certainly do not have to take my word for it. I provide both elements listed above for all our clients as part of a plan.
One final issue:
The second to last paragraph of your article says “you have to convince your lender …” This is a very daunting task you are suggesting to families without experience that may be in need of real help. You have a lot of power in your position. People take what you write in the newspaper many times as gospel. In my opinion your viewpoint and comment conveys a cavalier attitude that the waters are safe and the lenders are kind and cooperative. Respectfully, this is simply not the case and you are giving people false hope. You also may be sending them to the slaughter house as in the example I gave you with a client’s recent loan modification experience. If you recall this is where “The Great American Shake Down” continued and the lender robbed them of $10K only to increase the payment by $1,000 per month.
The Short Sale Negotiator in conjunction with Tucker & Assoc. PLLC battle with lenders everyday for our clients. If it were so easy we would have no purpose. It is not easy even for the experienced professionals.
Note: We have added several new additional items to our site to try to help skeptics better understand the solution (thenegotiatedsolution.com).
Thank you for your time and again for the honorable mention and link in Sunday’s paper. George